[ZBX-10561] Consistency of disabled elements Created: 2016 Mar 22  Updated: 2017 May 30  Resolved: 2016 Jun 29

Status: Closed
Project: ZABBIX BUGS AND ISSUES
Component/s: Frontend (F)
Affects Version/s: 3.0.0
Fix Version/s: 3.2.0alpha1

Type: Incident report Priority: Trivial
Reporter: Pavel Amosov (Inactive) Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: usability
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Attachments: PNG File Media_severity.png     PNG File disabled-elements-new.png     PNG File disabled-elements.png    

 Description   

Disabled or not active elements have 3 different visual styles. These should be unified.



 Comments   
Comment by richlv [ 2016 Mar 22 ]

they're functionally different things, though - input field, button and status indicator.
or am i missing something ?

Comment by Pavel Amosov (Inactive) [ 2016 Mar 22 ]

Nope, on the pic you see a disabled input field and a disabled "Filter" button. Just as an example. Two different styles, equal states. Maybe it's worth to think twice about the inactive status indicator, but I'd make it look the same as disabled inputs...

Comment by richlv [ 2016 Mar 22 ]

but do you mean the visual appearance ?
if so, i'd expect input fields to be different from buttons even when they are disabled - and same with the status indicator.
having functionally different things look the same would be terribly confusing.
unless i'm misunderstanding something terribly

Comment by Pavel Amosov (Inactive) [ 2016 Mar 23 ]

Proposed changes. Also, some tables may look less cluttered

Comment by Glebs Ivanovskis (Inactive) [ 2016 Apr 04 ]

There is one more style of disabled/enabled things in Profile -> Media.

Comment by Pavel Amosov (Inactive) [ 2016 Apr 08 ]

Profile --> Media --> "Use if severity" should follow the same UI pattern as severity selector in forms.

Comment by Aleksandrs Saveljevs [ 2016 Jun 27 ]

(1) Variable $btn-disabled-bg-color was changed from "transparent" to "#ebebeb" in _colors.scss, but was left at "transparent" in dark-theme.scss. Was that intentional or forgotten?

PavelA That was intentional

asaveljevs Thank you! CLOSED.

Comment by Aleksandrs Saveljevs [ 2016 Jun 27 ]

Available in pre-3.1.0 (trunk) r60755.

Generated at Fri Mar 29 16:04:13 EET 2024 using Jira 9.12.4#9120004-sha1:625303b708afdb767e17cb2838290c41888e9ff0.