|
Duplicate |
Team INT
[ZBX-18380] Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent Ethernet has changed to lower speed trigger expression Created: 2020 Sep 16 Updated: 2024 Apr 10 Resolved: 2020 Nov 01 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | ZABBIX BUGS AND ISSUES |
| Component/s: | Templates (T) |
| Affects Version/s: | 5.0.3 |
| Fix Version/s: | 5.0.6rc1, 5.2.1rc1, 5.4.0alpha1, 5.4 (plan) |
| Type: | Problem report | Priority: | Trivial |
| Reporter: | Arturs Lontons | Assignee: | Maxim Chudinov (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 1 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||
| Team: | Team INT |
||||
| Sprint: | Sprint 69 (Oct 2020) | ||||
| Story Points: | 0.25 | ||||
| Description |
|
Zabbix out of the box template Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent trigger prototype Interface {#IFNAME}({#IFALIAS}): Ethernet has changed to lower speed than it was before Has the following expression in it:
{Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.speed["{#IFNAME}"].change()}<0 and {Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.speed["{#IFNAME}"].last()}>0and ({Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.type["{#IFNAME}"].last()}=6 or{Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.type["{#IFNAME}"].last()}=7 or{Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.type["{#IFNAME}"].last()}=11 or{Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.type["{#IFNAME}"].last()}=62 or{Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.type["{#IFNAME}"].last()}=69 or{Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.type["{#IFNAME}"].last()}=117)and({Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.status["{#IFNAME}"].last()}<>2)
The last part checks if the interface status is NOT equal to connected:
({Template Module Windows network by Zabbix agent:net.if.status["{#IFNAME}"].last()}<>2)
What is the point to check the network speed for an interface that is not connected? Shouldn't it be the other way around? |
| Comments |
| Comment by Maxim Chudinov (Inactive) [ 2020 Oct 28 ] |
|
Available in:
|
| Comment by Constantin Oshmyan [ 2020 Dec 03 ] |
|
This ZBXNEXT seems to be very similar, but relates to SNMP-discovered interfaces. |