this might be still confusing, as triggers are not 'monitored'...
and unsupported items are still being monitored as well.

<richlv> if we do this, then the best option probably would be to change the dropdown label to something like "Triggers, referencing enabled items"
ugly, long, creating more work for translators but at least correct

(well, best actually would be those helper icons where we could provide more info, but meh)

zalex, do you think such a label would help users ?

<zalex> The last suggestion sounds good. I think that 4 words length it's NOT a problem at all. Compare please with labels for "Acknowledge status", there are 3,4 words length strings and they are ok.
I'm sure that an a bit long and clear string is much better than short&unclear one.
Then we could change also a "Problem" label to something more .... hmm .... "wide"(extended) if you like, but it's an option .

and please ignore extra work for translators, it's a minor issue

<zalex> also, as it is a status, probably this version would be correct "Any (triggers, referencing enabled items)"

<richlv> i'd prefer avoiding status, as ok/problem is also status...

<zalex> hey, maybe we could add a 3rd label - all without exceptions, i.e. including disabled/notsupported triggers ?
I suppose it would be useful and clear (with new corresponding strings).

<richlv> and filters for unknown and ok triggers, and... well, all that will have to go in zbxnexts

<Vedmak> so, is there decision on what need to be changed?

<zalex> I'm afraid my last suggestion leads to a new ZBXNEXT (which means no chances that it will be implemented)
So I don't know what to do. Probably we need more opinions.

<richlv> for this issue, i'd go with "Triggers, referencing enabled items" label change only

dev branch: svn://svn.zabbix.com/branches/dev/ZBX-5278

(1) about the dev branch: hmm, looks interesting.
You changed a description of the drop-down but not the "All" entry itself.
I'm not sure it's the same what Rich meant.

<pavels> I don't think the fix in the dev branch will do: it's completely unclear what does it mean and what does it have to do with the dropdown.

<richlv> we do have similar text and concept elsewhere, for example, see the tooltips in reports -> status of zabbix;
we can't go with "all (monitored)", because we do not have concept of "monitored" triggers (they can be enabled or disabled, and that's it).
what exactly is unclear ? is it the label ?

To properly resolve this issue we decided to implement changes described in ZBXNEXT-892