[ZBX-8514] Network discovery may change a passive proxy to host (status 6 to 0 in hosts table) Created: 2014 Jul 23 Updated: 2017 May 30 Resolved: 2014 Aug 12 |
|
Status: | Closed |
Project: | ZABBIX BUGS AND ISSUES |
Component/s: | Server (S) |
Affects Version/s: | 2.2.3 |
Fix Version/s: | 2.2.7rc1, 2.4.1rc1, 2.5.0 |
Type: | Incident report | Priority: | Blocker |
Reporter: | Filipe Paternot | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 1 |
Labels: | networkdiscovery, proxy, server | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Environment: |
Zabbix 2.2.3, centos 5.8 64bits, compiled from source, no paches |
Attachments: | #1 registred proxies.png #2 proxy detail.png #3 discovery found.png #4 action detail.png #5 discovery rule detail.png #6 missing proxy.png #7 hosts detail.png | ||||
Issue Links: |
|
Description |
===== =====
===== |
Comments |
Comment by Juris Miščenko (Inactive) [ 2014 Aug 04 ] |
Fix implemented at svn://svn.zabbix.com/branches/dev/ZBX-8514 |
Comment by Alexander Vladishev [ 2014 Aug 07 ] |
(1) "Remove host" operation can remove passive proxy with discovered IP. jurism RESOLVED. sasha CLOSED |
Comment by richlv [ 2014 Aug 11 ] |
(2) when the fix is finalised, let's document what will happen in all of these cases - maybe as a note in https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/2.2/manual/discovery/network_discovery ? jurism This is a bugfix. It will add a host instead of changing a proxy into a host, which was the bug. Why would that require documenting? <richlv> as discussed on irc, there should not be any potential conflicts (like host conflicting with a proxy), so indeed no need to document -> CLOSED |
Comment by Juris Miščenko (Inactive) [ 2014 Sep 24 ] |
Fixed in 2.2.7rc1 r49269, 2.4.1rc1 r49277, 2.5.0 (trunk) r49270. |