[ZBXNEXT-3904] calculated item formula: reference source item by ID instead of key Created: 2017 May 31 Updated: 2017 Dec 19 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | ZABBIX FEATURE REQUESTS |
| Component/s: | Server (S) |
| Affects Version/s: | 3.2.5 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | New Feature Request | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | itcbsops | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 2 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Description |
|
Currently, a calculated item takes a formula in which you can reference another item (let's call it a source item) by specifying its key. See manual here : https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/3.4/manual/config/items/itemtypes/calculated The problem with that are :
Proposed improvement: why not adopting an alternative syntax for calcultated item's formula that would take an item's refernce by its ID instead of key ? Here is an example of a formula from a calulated item we have in our system: in the future, the formula could be instead : (could be displayed as item's name as it is in the trigger expression editor, for instance) |
| Comments |
| Comment by Glebs Ivanovskis (Inactive) [ 2017 May 31 ] |
|
May be considered a duplicate of |
| Comment by richlv [ 2017 May 31 ] |
|
the user-visible formula should not use item ids, but the internal representation might. as mentioned, it would be somewhat similar to triggers then. |
| Comment by itcbsops [ 2017 May 31 ] |
|
none of the two duplicate this ticket, though it looks like a duplicate of |
| Comment by itcbsops [ 2017 May 31 ] |
|
I agree with richlv : the item ID should be used internally. Right now it's not. It is free text. Which is silly. |
| Comment by itcbsops [ 2017 Dec 19 ] |
|
Hi, Any progress on this Jira ? |
| Comment by Glebs Ivanovskis (Inactive) [ 2017 Dec 19 ] |
|
No, no progress. As you see at the moment there are literally zero votes on this issue. Bringing more votes and/or sponsorship may draw some attention to the problem. |