[ZBXNEXT-484] Filter Overview by application Created: 2010 Aug 23 Updated: 2014 Sep 30 Resolved: 2013 Jul 03 |
|
Status: | Closed |
Project: | ZABBIX FEATURE REQUESTS |
Component/s: | Frontend (F) |
Affects Version/s: | 1.8.3 |
Fix Version/s: | 2.1.0 |
Type: | New Feature Request | Priority: | Major |
Reporter: | Robert Hau | Assignee: | Ivo Kurzemnieks |
Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 11 |
Labels: | overview, screens | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Environment: |
Any |
Attachments: | zabbix_2.0_overview-by-app.patch | ||||||||||||
Issue Links: |
|
Description |
It would be nice to have a filterable overiew that could have certain groups. Example Overview for one server has 100 points, but only 5 points are important during normal operations, It would be nice to pick which ones you want to see and save it. |
Comments |
Comment by Ronald van Zantvoort [ 2011 Feb 07 ] |
Agree. I would propose being able to (sub)select 'Applications' in Monitoring>Overview Also, in the configuration of Screens this would be particularly useful. Allowing for picking & displaying only certain Applications on those screens would vastly improve the usability of the Data Overview Screen component. |
Comment by richlv [ 2011 Feb 10 ] |
filtering by applications might solve |
Comment by Ronald van Zantvoort [ 2011 Feb 10 ] |
<GASP> you are correct, sir I'd even go as far as calling these two duplicates. |
Comment by Robert Hau [ 2011 Feb 10 ] |
Guys, One important feature is the ability to save your filters. Perhaps that will be a stage 2. But if you could switch back and forth between System Level, Application Level, User Level it would be great (Each being a seperate Application or group of Applications) |
Comment by richlv [ 2011 Aug 13 ] |
patch for overview filtering by application submitted at http://www.zabbix.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22994 |
Comment by dougbee [ 2011 Dec 05 ] |
This patch (using the posted 1.8.7 version in our 1.8.9 environment) is working very well for us in our production environment. Please consider incorporating into the standard release. |
Comment by Brendan Gilmore [ 2012 Jun 15 ] |
I've updated the patch from the forums to 2.0. The patch is based on the 2.0 Branch from SVN revision 28312. |
Comment by richlv [ 2012 Nov 01 ] |
|
Comment by [email protected] [ 2012 Nov 07 ] |
Is work occurring on either this or |
Comment by Alexei Vladishev [ 2012 Dec 04 ] |
Specification is available at http://www.zabbix.org/wiki/Docs/specs/ZBXNEXT-484. The feature will be developed soon. |
Comment by Oleg Egorov (Inactive) [ 2012 Dec 12 ] |
(2) Functions "_initApplications, getApplicationsCB" in class.cpagefilter.php should be commented according to PHPDoc standard. For functions "get_items_data_overview" in items.inc.php and "get_triggers_overview" in trigger.inc.php should be changed PHPDoc description. Vedmak RESOLVED oleg.egorov CLOSED |
Comment by Oleg Egorov (Inactive) [ 2012 Dec 12 ] |
Tested! |
Comment by Alexey Fukalov [ 2012 Dec 12 ] |
Available in version pre-2.1.0 (trunk) r32097. |
Comment by Martins Valkovskis [ 2012 Dec 13 ] |
Updated documentation in: http://www.zabbix.com/documentation/2.2/manual/introduction/whatsnew220#frontend_improvements http://www.zabbix.com/documentation/2.2/manual/config/visualisation/screens#adding_elements currently does not provide screenshots for configuring each resource so nothing done there at this point. alexei I also updated database structure. CLOSED |
Comment by richlv [ 2013 Jun 11 ] |
this resulted in a regression : |
Comment by Alexander Vladishev [ 2013 Jun 13 ] |
(3) Empty overview if no application is defined in at least one host of hostgroup. Related issue: iivs RESOLVED in svn://svn.zabbix.com/branches/dev/ZBXNEXT-484 oleg.egorov REOPEN New problem: Should be discussed iivs
RESOLVED in r36696 oleg.egorov CLOSED |
Comment by Chris de Claverie [ 2013 Jun 19 ] |
any update for 2.0 plz? |
Comment by richlv [ 2013 Jun 19 ] |
there are no plans to backport this to 2.0 |
Comment by Chris de Claverie [ 2013 Jun 19 ] |
why that? that's so useful! |
Comment by Sergey Syreskin [ 2013 Jun 19 ] |
Guys, why not just wait until 2.2 is released? Hope it will be very soon. |
Comment by Chris de Claverie [ 2013 Jun 19 ] |
anyone got a date 'bout the eventual release? |
Comment by Oleg Egorov (Inactive) [ 2013 Jul 03 ] |
TESTED! |
Comment by Ivo Kurzemnieks [ 2013 Jul 04 ] |
Fixed in pre-2.1.0 (trunk) r36703 |