[ZBXNEXT-6234] Add disk latency monitoring to Windows template Created: 2020 Oct 04 Updated: 2024 Apr 10 Resolved: 2020 Dec 03 |
|
Status: | Closed |
Project: | ZABBIX FEATURE REQUESTS |
Component/s: | Templates (T) |
Affects Version/s: | 5.0.4 |
Fix Version/s: | 5.0.7rc1, 5.2.3rc1, 5.4.0alpha1, 5.4 (plan) |
Type: | Change Request | Priority: | Trivial |
Reporter: | Benoit Machiavello | Assignee: | Maxim Chudinov (Inactive) |
Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 3 |
Labels: | disk, diskio, template, windows | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
Team: | |
Sprint: | Sprint 69 (Oct 2020), Sprint 70 (Nov 2020), Sprint 71 (Dec 2020) |
Story Points: | 0.25 |
Description |
the Linux template monitor disk read and write latency vfs.dev.read.await[{#DEVNAME}] can you add these values in the windows template. perf_counter_en["\PhysicalDisk({#DEVNAME})\Avg. Disk sec/Read",60] |
Comments |
Comment by Benoit Machiavello [ 2020 Oct 04 ] |
and corresponding trigger too
thanks a lot |
Comment by Marco Hofmann [ 2020 Nov 11 ] |
I don't understand this request? Can you explain it to me please BMachiavello ? I have that item in my (official) Windows OS Templates since ever, and when you browse in the Zabbix Git repo you can find it in the 3.4 Template for example: <key>perf_counter[\234(_Total)\1402]</key> Was it removed in the time between 3.4 and 5.0 Templates re-desing by the team of alarionovs ? Why has it to be re-added? Update: I browsed all release tags, and it seems like it was missing in 5.0.0 and re-added in like 5.0.2. I think that is the reason for this request. |
Comment by Benoit Machiavello [ 2020 Nov 13 ] |
Not sure you speak about the same thing
1402 is Avg. Disk Queue Length I speak about adding Avg. Disk sec/Read and write which is the latency |
Comment by Marco Hofmann [ 2020 Nov 16 ] |
I'm very sorry. I really mixed things up. You are right, Avg. Disk sec/Read|Write isn't there, wasn't there and should be there. But thanks to you I discovered, that Average disk read queue length perf_counter[\234(_Total)\1402] and Average disk write queue length perf_counter[\234(_Total)\1404] are missing from the 5.0.5 Template. |
Comment by Maxim Chudinov (Inactive) [ 2020 Nov 16 ] |
Hello Marco.
perf_counter_en["\PhysicalDisk(\{#DEVNAME})\Current Disk Queue Length",60]
. |
Comment by Marco Hofmann [ 2020 Nov 17 ] |
Yes! In the past we had severals cases where this value helped us to troubleshoot MS SQL Server issues. IMHO I don't find the combined value helpful. |
Comment by Maxim Chudinov (Inactive) [ 2020 Dec 02 ] |
Available in:
|