[ZBXNEXT-782] Pollers should not be connected to the database Created: 2011 May 12 Updated: 2024 Apr 10 Resolved: 2020 Dec 08 |
|
Status: | Closed |
Project: | ZABBIX FEATURE REQUESTS |
Component/s: | Server (S) |
Affects Version/s: | None |
Fix Version/s: | 5.4.0alpha1, 5.4 (plan) |
Type: | Change Request | Priority: | Major |
Reporter: | Alexander Vladishev | Assignee: | Vladislavs Sokurenko |
Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 1 |
Labels: | performance, scalability | ||
Σ Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified |
Σ Time Spent: | Not Specified | Time Spent: | Not Specified |
Σ Original Estimate: | Not Specified | Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
Sub-Tasks: |
|
||||||||||
Team: | Team A | ||||||||||
Sprint: | Sprint 70 (Nov 2020), Sprint 71 (Dec 2020) | ||||||||||
Story Points: | 3 |
Description |
Currently pollers have own connection to the database for updating statuses of items and hosts. |
Comments |
Comment by Alexander Vladishev [ 2011 May 24 ] |
Added support of not-supported items by the history cache. |
Comment by Alexander Vladishev [ 2011 May 27 ] |
Added support of processing not supported items by a history syncer in a version pre1.8.6, r19897. Reopened this issue for implementing activation/deactivation hosts by a history syncer. |
Comment by richlv [ 2011 Nov 24 ] |
host activation/deactivation split out as ZBXNEXT-1040 |
Comment by Oleksii Zagorskyi [ 2012 Jan 29 ] |
Just for record: for 2.0 branch implemented in version 1.9.5 |
Comment by Alexander Vladishev [ 2012 Jul 27 ] |
The issue is completed partially. I reopen it. |
Comment by Vladislavs Sokurenko [ 2020 Nov 30 ] |
Implemented in:
Updated documentation:
|
Comment by Constantin Oshmyan [ 2020 Nov 30 ] |
and
Will this enhancement be implemented in other versions, for example 5.0.x (the current LTS)? |
Comment by Vladislavs Sokurenko [ 2020 Nov 30 ] |
Unfortunately it was not planned for any other versions due to major changes such as introduction of new process. Are you having issues due to many database connections, can you please describe the problem ? |
Comment by Constantin Oshmyan [ 2020 Nov 30 ] |
vso, we had problem only once (link to a ticket in Russian). |
Comment by Vladislavs Sokurenko [ 2020 Nov 30 ] |
I see, thank you for explanation, documenting which process use database connection would be nice addition. |