[ZBXNEXT-443] History view with lots of events and several items needs to be improved Created: 2010 Jun 28 Updated: 2016 Sep 29 |
|
Status: | Open |
Project: | ZABBIX FEATURE REQUESTS |
Component/s: | Frontend (F) |
Affects Version/s: | 1.8.3 |
Fix Version/s: | None |
Type: | Change Request | Priority: | Major |
Reporter: | Oleksii Zagorskyi | Assignee: | Unassigned |
Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 2 |
Labels: | eventlog, log, logmonitoring | ||
Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
Environment: |
1.8.3 |
Issue Links: |
|
Description |
this request as a continuation of the After I worked intensively with the monitoring of Windows events log, I decided to write a few serious request. This is the first of them In most cases it is meant that the selected multiple items for display, but not only. It would be useful at the bottom of the table to add statistics on how many lines from each items was displayed. Also another problem: Set a limit of 1000. I propose to consider the proposal - to make individual requests for each item selected in the list. And set limit 1000 for each items individualy and not for all together. Also very useful would be to add the ability to sort by user not only on the field "id", as well as the "clock" and "timestamp". And sometimes really, really need to see how events actually occur on the Host in real order with several journals simultaneously. Possibility of manualy user sorting by "clock" and "timestamp" should help in this. Sorry for my english |
Comments |
Comment by richlv [ 2010 Jul 07 ] |
these issues will be very hard to work on, because too many things are piled in them. numbered summaries would be helpful... in this case : 1. in log monitoring, showing stats for each added log would be useful (how many lines from each); |
Comment by richlv [ 2010 Jul 07 ] |
...and my take on some of them 3. regarding this suggestion, it could cause problems - this limit is for performance reasons, and making it per item could result in lots and lots of data to be displayed. additionally, it might increase sql query count (just a guess) |
Comment by richlv [ 2010 Jul 07 ] |
...and this is really a feature request, not a bug |
Comment by Oleksii Zagorskyi [ 2011 Feb 13 ] |
answers to Richlv: |
Comment by Oleksii Zagorskyi [ 2015 Sep 16 ] |
See also |