Uploaded image for project: 'ZABBIX BUGS AND ISSUES'
  1. ZABBIX BUGS AND ISSUES
  2. ZBX-16298

JMX, Solution for problem with same KEY in the same host, is optimal?

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Problem report Problem report
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Icon: Minor Minor
    • None
    • 4.0.9
    • Linux zabbixeqt 4.9.0-9-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.168-1+deb9u3 (2019-06-16) x86_64 GNU/Linux

      description: Space-saving Computer
      vendor: WYSE
      version: Rev 1
      width: 64 bits

      Hello, I'm sorry but I do not know how to categorize this ...

      We need to know that the solution is safe in the short and medium time, thank you. (we resume below)

      In summary, we have many Java services in the same virtual machine, and each of these Java services has independent endpoints to monitor with JMX, but we need to monitor the same KEYS ...
      For example:
      jmx ["java.lang: type = ClassLoading", UnloadedClassCount]

      The problem is that Zabbix does not accept more than one KEY on the same host, and we found a solution for this, but ...
      We have found a solution, and this is to add a "blank space" in the key ... For example:
      jmx ["java.lang: type = ClassLoading", UnloadedClassCount]
      jmx ["java.lang: type = ClassLoading", UnloadedClassCount]
      jmx ["java.lang: type = ClassLoading", UnloadedClassCount]
      ...

      Of course, I do not understand exactly why this works, but my fears are that in the future, zabbix will be updated and ... Is posible this will stop working.
      The question is, how safe is this method to be used?

      Thank you

            agavrilovs Aleksandrs Petrovs-Gavrilovs
            sistemes Sistemes
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: