Hi,

We recently performed some analysis on the possible storage & processing savings involved in adding a tinyint based history_bool (or history_tiny) table in addition to the existing history_uint table. We found there would be significant savings in doing so.

I would like to ask if is is possible to do this, I am tempted to take a look at the source myself and see what is required and I suspect the work to add history_bool would be trivial given that bool is already an acceptable datatype.

I look forward to a positive response.

Mathew